Sunday, June 8

Upheaval

Just read about the tragic rampage in Akihabara, which is scarier in that I was in the exact same spot at the exact same time last week. Sadly, 17 people were injured (after a 25 year old drove a lorry through a busy street and then continued by stabbing) and at least 7 died. A few things I want to comment on:

It's a tragedy, no doubt about that. And throughout my time here, there seem to be killing sprees more often. But that these 'freak occurrences' make shocking front page news every time says more about the lack of them than the number of times they actually occur. Japan still has a comparatively minimal crime rate, and I feel safer here than anywhere I've ever been. In the most recent murder rates (per 100,000 people) for example, the US stands at 5.7, the UK at 2.03 and Japan at 0.50.

It's a safe country.

There's not much you can do to prevent someone running people down, but there is a possibility of restraining someone with a knife (on top of the close-proximity needed when using a knife to the victims). Knife crimes are horrific, gun crimes more so, and this is thankfully not a problem in Japan, whether that changes in the future or not.

The biggest problem I see is more deeply centred, and will raise a lot more questions before answers are given. Going to the root of the problem: why are the murders happening at all? It's all too easy to write 'a crazed guy' or as the TimesOnline notes 'a man with a sense of exhaustion and disgust with life'. Fair enough, but why?

Japan is a good country, if you want to play by its rules, which can simply be summed up as 'you join the rat-race, you do what everyone else does and expects of you, you don't complain, you work your arse off, and you'll be fine'.

From the earliest school-days where students (who I've taught anyway) seem to come away with no ability - whether want or freedom to express - of imagination and individuality, Japanese are expected to become a replica from a determined mould of society. (Which is why on the weekends fashion is outrageous). But for those children who have grown up to watch their fathers, and more recently mothers, work 14-hour days in between being piled into trains with people who are no different, or dare I say special, from them, people want more.

This desire has been exaggerated with the internet and other means of modern communication; we can all see how others live, how celebrities enjoy the high life, how our peers have bigger houses, better cars, and less stress and so on. You only have to notice how there is never a week without a reality 'talent' show on tv - everyone wants to be a winner.

And why shouldn't they?

Japan is not a poor country, nor an expensive one. If you want a good meal, have one. A good holiday, take it. There are few here who really could say they have a bad quality of life when you take into consideration the basic needs of warmth, shelter and food.

But needs change, alongside our expectations and comparisons with others.

It's been bugging me recently how many times I hear people say 'I need this' or 'I need that'. No they don't. It's a dangerous word that shouldn't be used lightly. Going slightly off topic, a recent episode of The Apprentice saw the firing of a less-than-typical businesswoman whom the other contestants bullied for her statement that she didn't 'need the job' (earning more money than on offer). Instead, she 'wanted the job' while the others despaired that they 'needed it'. Again, no they don't. They just really want it. They really want to be the winner. Maybe it wasn't so off topic after all.

People want a good life, and rarely it's the case that they get everything they want.

Two things can be drawn from this:

1) It's time to consider what, apart from those basic needs already listed, should be a 'need' drawn from the modernisation of civilisation. Should less work-load be a 'need'? A bi-annual holiday? To be a winner?

2) It's not good enough to say this is what your parents and their parents did, and they were happy so you should be too. With changing times comes changing wants and expectations (and needs). We can no longer rest on what has been, but what must now be. If people are dissatisfied with the choices they are given, it is futile to retort with a tough-luck stance, because people with a 'sense of exhaustion and disgust with life' will continue to show it. As the TimesOnline goes on to say 'Japanese in their 20s use blogs and internet message boards to describe a growing pessimism over the future. They do not want to follow their parents into the drudgery of the “salaryman” life, but have only limited prospects beyond that.'

Tradition is a dangerous thing; if times are changing but peoples' opinions are not allowed to, there is going to be a head-on collision. The same is true for all aspects of tradition, not just culture and society, but fashion, taste, media, religion, relationships, education and so on.

This is something the world is waking up to. Unfortunately Japan had a wake-up call today.

---
Synonyms to upheaval include: agitation, cataclysm, catastrophe, change, chaos, disturbance, revolution, shakeout and turmoil; seemed a suitable heading.

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

Just saw the news today, oh boy, all the lonely people where do they all come from, the Beatles really summed it up.

So as you point out killings are lower in Japan, why? More respect of traditions. a MORE STRUCTURED MORAL SOCIETY? But then Japenese lead the ranking on extremism by suicide. For a controlled society, this pins a large question on the fabric of that society? So is a return/keeping to tradition so bad?
Can the world be multicultural? Britain has tried and failed. If it is classified as a success why do the Scots, Irish and Welsch want independence? Why are the English so hated? How comes the dictatorship of Mugabe stands but Sadam was toppled?
Imagine a world where we respect each other, and live side by side rather than trying to prove that our race, colour, creed whatever is superior to yours. If the very basis of belief of a superior was acknowledged then we would all get along far better. If people made commitments and lived by them then the world would be a far nicer place. Perhaps if we followed the 10 commandments then this could be a recipe for a good life.... funny then it's Shavout tonight.... the time when the Jews received the big 10....... so back to basics.... chag sema'ch! love Dadxxxx

phil-san said...

"If the very basis of belief of a superior was acknowledged, then we would all get along far better?"

- I don't follow.

1) I assume you mean the Judaeo-Christian god, or the Abrahamic god (including Islam). If other religions are allowed to prevail in this line of thought, would we still all get along? Isn't this the world of religious suicide-bombers, where we go to war because "In God we trust"?

2) Do we need a superior to be moral? There is a strong genetic-evolutionary reason for ethics (namely, kin cooperation). If people are only moral because of their religious belief (probably for the psychologically-comforting notion of heaven), that is worrying. Does that mean that if they stop believing in god, they will murder? We repress evil thoughts because of faith? I don't think so. There are plenty of case studies to suggest that religious societies become pretty bad as soon as policing disappears (even though 'god is watching').

I'm sure there are plenty of atheists who would be offended by their perceived lack of ethics.

3) If our morals are from a superior, where does responsibility lie? Should we be held accountable for any evil actions, if a superior has already determined what would happen? If we decide our own morals for ourselves, responsibility lies with us.

4) And if we don't follow the ten commandments:

And he that blasphemeth the name of the Lord, he shall surely be put to death, and all the congregation shall certainly stone him - Leviticus 24:16

A threat of death is hardly a good reason (ironic somewhat) to be moral.

4) "So is a return/keeping to tradition so bad?"

Six days may work be done, but in the seventh is the Sabbath of rest, holy to the Lord: whosoever doeth any work in the Sabbath day, he shall surely be put to death - Exodus 31:15-17

Uh, yes.

5) And it's not jut the ten commandments that don't fit in with modern society. Consider gender equality/homosexuality among others (I'll spread out the quotes, and look at the new testament as well):

But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence - 1 Timothy 2:12
If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them - Leviticus 20:13

This is the source from which we could all have "a good life"?!

"Imagine a world where we respect eachother".

As soon as bring 'commandments' into the mix, respect is extremely difficult.

6) An interesting question is Pascal's wager, which states that if there is a possibility of going to heaven, why not just 'be' religious and thus you'll be fine. What have you got to lose?*

Well, consider the Atheist's wager - we have one life so why not make the most of it. Treat people nicely, be a good person as your parents and teachers have taught you to be, and take responsibility for your actions.

"Back to basics"

I sure hope not.

-
*Ignore for the moment the question of which religion to choose, or whether you must 'believe' or just 'go along with it'.

McGarmott said...

You are one of two friends of mine in Tokyo who happen to be in Akihabara the previous week and then hear about the stabbing now. Heh.

Anonymous said...

I take the point of want and need in the Aprentice reference, but the point about the woman (can't remember her name) who used that and was fired was of course her use of the not need but want, was extremely insensitive. I know you were making a different point, but she appeared to see the world from her perspective. I saw very little of the series to that point, but seemed like she got fired because of her interactions with others rather than, say, her intelectual capability.

Will be good to see you in July. I'm still enjoying the blog. By the way does it stop when you come home?

Michael

phil-san said...

Mike, I agree - she wasn't suitable for the job for both her own sanity (not what she deep down wanted) nor for the company (she's not a good team-player, and is better off as a contractor). But yes, the point was that the others picked her apart for the wrong reasons.

I guess you'll know the winner sometime tonight, which will be tomorrow my time. Does that mean I find out after you, or I find out in the future? Very confused right now.

As for the blog, it's become second nature to me now. As soon as something interesting happens my immediate thought is, I wonder a good title? (Actually this is detrimental too because I start writing the article in my head, so never get motivated to actually 'write' it the second time around).

So I can't see myself stopping entirely. But what do I do? Write about Japanese restaurants in London? Japanese-dense areas? Or does the blog die an honourable and timely death?

"It's good to write."

Really looking forward to seeing you too/two. xxxx

Anonymous said...

Gosh, I've only been away a few days and SO MUCH to read. I'm looking forward to sitting down later (after the tennis!) and catching up.
Mum xxx